A 2027 marketing budget is a frame before it is a spreadsheet
On this page06 sections
A new year’s budget often opens by placing a percentage on top of last year’s sheet. A percentage is an easy sentence. It does not say what worked, what stayed an experiment, or whether the business could receive the demand that arrived. There is no ready-made ratio for 2027 either. That absence is not a gap. It is an admission that not every company’s year has the same job.
This piece does not hand out line items, and it does not say to put this much into ads and that much into content. It sets out the distinctions that belong on the table before a number is discussed. Without them, the sheet is a copy of last year.
A year is not twelve identical months
When a marketing budget is sliced like a flat line, the busy stretch and the quiet stretch get the same share. In some months demand rises on its own. Some months are a window when the team cannot keep up with production. Some months should be set aside for learning. Giving them the same slice in advance prepares the mid-year surprise that the budget ran out, or that it could not be spent.
The frame here is not inventing a calendar. It is writing down which months are genuinely different on the sales, production or cash side. If there is no difference, an even split is itself a decision. If there is a difference, a total figure says little until the sheet shows it.
Last year’s number does not have to be the floor
“We increased it over last year” sounds like a plan. If last year is the floor, last year’s mistakes are written into the floor. A channel that did not work keeps its place because it was already there. Work that did work stays small because it started small.
A more useful question: which outcome does this year have to produce, and for which part of that outcome do we already have evidence? Evidence is not one good week in a panel. It is an arrival you can repeat, a qualified enquiry, or a conversation sales can follow. A line without evidence should sit in the budget as something to test this year, not as something that was there last year too.
What you know and what you are testing should not share a line
A year plan holds two kinds of spend. One continues work whose usefulness you have already seen. The other tests a channel, a message or a page you have not seen yet. Fold both into a single line called marketing, and a failed test gets read as a failed year. When a test works, people forget it was a bounded trial and spread it across the whole year at once.
The frame asks you to separate the test’s duration and the sign you will watch, before it starts. There is no number of weeks that fits every job. The sign does not have to be that likes went up. It has to be tied to the question the test is supposed to answer. If the question is unwritten, the spend is habit, not a test.
The budget stops where the business can answer
Raising spend can raise demand. If the people, stock, appointment hours or quoting capacity that receive the demand are not rising with it, the budget past a point piles up work nobody answers. That looks like the fault of the ad line. The usual gap is that the sheet has no capacity line at all.
In a 2027 plan, next to the marketing figure, write how much demand the business can take seriously in the same period. If the number is not known yet, write that it is not known. An invented capacity does more harm than an invented budget, because the two appear to confirm each other.
The places you will stop during the year are chosen first
A frame is not a file locked in the first month and opened in the last. If you do not choose a few points in the year to stop and look, the sheet walks on its own and nobody sees which assumption broke. These stops are not a campaign calendar. They are not a made-up year written as a named push on a named date.
The question at a stop is simple. Is the work we called evidenced still producing evidence? Did the test answer its question in the time set aside? Does capacity still match the work coming in? If one answer is no, keeping the total and changing what sits inside it is a legitimate decision. Staying loyal to the opening sheet is not the same as staying loyal to the year.
The number comes last
The total budget is discussed after these distinctions are written. First the job, then the split between evidence and test, then capacity, then the stops inside the year. The number sits on top of those. The reverse order, setting an amount aside and then dividing it across channels, produces an uncertainty that has been portioned out.
This frame is not a proposal and it recommends no ratio. If the year has not decided which sentence it will carry, the amounts of the lines that would carry that sentence are not decided either. The message decision and the budget decision belong at the same table. Without one, the other can look tidy as a sheet and stay empty as work.