Is going viral the right goal for every brand?
On this page06 sections
When a piece reaches far more people than anyone expected, the room gets excited. Someone shares a screenshot, the team talks about it, and the next job is asked to jump the same way. The problem starts when that jump becomes the goal before anyone asks whether it helped the business.
Going viral is an outcome. Sometimes it is a welcome one, sometimes it is only noise. This piece does not dismiss reach. It asks what should count before reach replaces the brief.
Spread and the job may point in different directions
A video can be watched widely by people who still have no idea what the brand sells. Humour, surprise or argument gathers attention. Attention is not the same as understanding the offer, trust, or an enquiry. Those need to be looked at on their own.
When the goal is written as “make it viral,” the team chooses whatever will be watched. That may not be what the brand meant to say. A brief can carry an idea that is capable of spreading. Spread should not be the only condition of success.
The wrong crowd has a cost
Wide reach also brings people who have nothing to do with the brand. Comments can turn sharp, context can fall away, and the brand can be reduced to a joke. That is not always a disaster. For a service business, though, a week of being mocked should not be reported as “visibility.”
A hypothetical example: a clinic publishes a short, playful video and it spreads quickly. Most viewers are not looking for a clinic. The ones who are wonder whether that tone belongs anywhere near a serious appointment. Reach went up. Trust remained something that still had to be tested.
A peak you cannot repeat is not a plan
A spike often depends on things stacking up: timing, how the platform distributed work that week, the mood of the audience, sometimes luck. Repeating the formula next month does not repeat the result. When it fails, the team is made to feel unsuccessful, even if the goal was badly set.
Celebrating a spike and turning it into the production rhythm are different decisions. The rhythm’s job is to keep the brand understandable and remembered. An occasional piece that travels further can sit on top of that rhythm. It cannot replace it.
Write into the brief the thing you will actually read
If the aim is for a specific audience to understand an offer, the thing to watch is not a view record. It is whether those people saved the piece, came to the site, or asked a question. If the aim is for a launch to be heard, reach can be part of the job. “It was heard” and “it was understood correctly” are still checked separately.
Writing the measure first does not mean denying a piece of work if it spreads. It stops one box in the report from closing the whole story. Something can travel far and do no work. Something can travel modestly and do the work with the right person.
Work that is remembered and work that is passed on
Some pieces are shared because they are short and startling. Others are not shared, and a week later the viewer can still describe the brand. The second kind may be more useful in a sales conversation. The first puts the brand, briefly, in a crowded room.
Both can be made. The choice depends on what the brand needs that month. Summarising every month’s need as “make it spread further” locks production onto one feeling: surprise. Surprise is not the material of every job.
When wide reach is the right ask
Reach itself can matter when a new name is being announced, a public topic is being discussed, or the business genuinely speaks to a broad crowd. Even then the message has to survive being passed along. A short, accurate sentence the brand can stand behind travels better than an inflated promise.
Before viral is written down as the goal, one question is enough: after someone who has never heard of us watches this, which sentence do we want them to be able to say about the brand? If that sentence cannot be formed, the reach goal has arrived too early.